• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (2)

Transit decision explained

Kings Transit

Kings Transit

Published on January 12, 2012
Published on January 12, 2012

Warden Ritchie states the county’s case for negotiating with TCTS

Topics :
Kings Transit board , Trans County Transportation Society , Annapolis County Municipal council , Annapolis County , Bridgetown , Greenwood

(EDITOR’S NOTE: Following is a letter to Annapolis County residents from Warden Reg Ritchie explaining the county’s decision to seek and alternative to Kings Tranist.)

 

To Residents of the County of Annapolis:

 

In December, Annapolis County Municipal council made a decision to begin contract negotiations with Trans County Transportation Society (TCTS) to replace Kings Transit as the county’s local transit service manager. The county issued a press release on this matter; however, it would appear that some facts have been misunderstood by residents which is resulting in confusion and concern. It is my hope to clarify these misunderstandings and explain the rationale for this strategic decision of council.

I think it would be most helpful to start with some basic facts on our existing transit service that is presently being provided by Kings Transit. The service includes a route from Greenwood to Bridgetown (Annapolis East bus) and a route from Bridgetown to Cornwallis (Annapolis West bus). The county does, in fact, own the buses for both routes. We purchased the Annapolis East bus for $302,132 in 2005 and the Annapolis West bus for $288,535.67 in 2007. The county pays for ALL costs associated with the operation of both buses (ie: driver wages, workers compensation, bus maintenance, wiper blades, fuel, etc.) PLUS approximately $60,000 per year to Kings Transit to manage the service for us.

The county pays approximately $287,000 per year for the entire transit service. The taxpayers of Annapolis County subsidize the Annapolis East bus service by 48 per cent (ridership fares are budgeted at $120,310 and the municipal subsidy is budgeted at $110,116) and subsidize the Annapolis West bus service by 73 per cent (ridership fares are budgeted at $65,700 and the municipal subsidy is budgeted at $177,202). Municipal council recognizes that a 73 per cent subsidy is a concern and efficiencies must be identified to address this situation. With TCTS’s help we will be looking for potential solutions.

 

Governance

In terms of governance, the County of Annapolis does not have a voting member on the board of Kings Transit. The board of Kings Transit is made up of three councillors from King’s County, one councillor from the Town of Berwick, one councillor from the Town of Wolfville and one councillor from the Town of Kentville.

The county’s contract with Kings Transit to manage our transit service expired in 2009 and we have been operating on a month-by-month basis since that time. Contract negotiations broke down over the issue of who would have authority to spend funds provided through government transit grants. This issue arose from a dispute with Kings Transit regarding the use of Public Transit Funds provided as a grant from the federal government. This grant was given to transit providers based on ridership numbers. The amount for Annapolis County was $404,000. Since Annapolis County owns the buses, pays all of the costs associated with the service, and simply pays Kings Transit a management fee to manage our service, we expected to be able to direct the use of the $404,000 to ensure it maximized its benefit to Annapolis County taxpayers who are subsidizing the service to such a high degree.

 

No Say For Annapolis

Unfortunately, the board of Kings Transit refused to allow Annapolis County Municipal Council to have any say on how the $404,000 was spent. The funds were issued in Kings Transit’s name and were used for a garage facility in Kings County. Council repeatedly sent representatives to the Kings Transit board meetings to protest the planned use of Annapolis County’s portion of these funds ($404,000) and demand that council be given an opportunity to direct the expenditure of the monies that our taxpayers’ subsidization made possible. For example, in the upcoming 2012 capital budget, Annapolis County municipal council had planned an expenditure of $400,000 for a new bus. Council may have wanted to use the grant funding for this expenditure in order to relieve their taxpayers of this upcoming cost. The response from Kings Transit was that they needed the funds for the garage facility, and refused the county’s request. Kings Transit attempted to justify the garage expenditure to council but at the end of the day would not allow Annapolis County municipal council to make the expenditure decision on behalf of our taxpayers. The county has taken this matter to court.

 

TCTS

We are fortunate in Annapolis County to have TCTS providing excellent service to their riders, the local health authority and the school board. The board of TCTS is made up of Annapolis County residents and includes a member of the Annapolis County municipal council. Council believes TCTS can provide a flexible and responsive service, as well as provide market intelligence to enable good decision-making regarding service provision. In addition, mechanic services and other business-related expenses will be obtained in Annapolis County in order to support local business and maximize the financial benefits to our taxpayers. We are looking forward to working with TCTS in 2012.

 

Addressing Fears

Now to address some fears regarding routes, fares, and transfers between the two transit systems. The current routes and times will not change when TCTS takes over management of the service. The Annapolis East bus will still run between Greenwood and Bridgetown at the same times, fares, and the Annapolis West bus will still run between Bridgetown and Cornwallis at the same times. TCTS met with Kings Transit to discuss transfers between systems and we expect that riders will be able to transfer at no cost between the two. The issue of the 73 per cent subsidy on the Annapolis West route may result in the need for the county to adjust the schedule in the future. TCTS will collect market intelligence and may recommend changes next year. This would be an issue regardless of who managed the service.

I hope this information is helpful to our residents. Please be assured that municipal council expects this step will result in an improved transit service for our taxpayers.

 

Sincerely,

Reg C. Ritchie

Warden

County of Annapolis

Comments

  • Username
    DIGBYDEVIL
    - January 22, 2012 at 13:47:47

    SOUNDS LIKE A LOT OF MONEY FOR THIS SMALL SERVICE.. JUST ANOTHER MONEY GRAB FOR THOSE WHO SHOULD NOT BE GETTING IT...OVER PAYED JOBS IN A TIME OF HARDSHIPS IN ALL COMMUNITES...IM SHURE THE SERVICE IS BADLY NEEDED BUT I AM SHURE IT COULD BE DONE FOR FAR LESS MONEY WITHOUT HURTING SERVICE....MAYBE THE PAYED EMPLOYEES AT THE TOP ARE GETTING FAR TO MUCH PAY FOR WHAT THEY DO AS IM SHURE SOME ARE.... ITS THE SAME WITH ANYTHING OF THIS TYPE OF MATTER..JUST ANOTHER OF WE NEED TO TIGHTEN OUR BELTS WHILE THE OVERSEERES LOOSEN THEIRS AND FATTEN UP THEIR BANK ACCOUNTS AT TAXPAYERS EXPENCE....START TRIMMING AT THE TOP AND IM SHURE YOU WILL FIND LOTS OF FAT...IF THEY ARE MAKING MORE THAN 30 OR 40 K A YEAR THEIR GRETTING PAYED TOO MUCH !!!!PEOPLE IN THOSE POSITIONS FEEL THAT THEY ARE WORTH WAY MOREW THAN THEY REALY ARE ...A TITLE DON'T MAKE YOU WORTH MORE THAN ANYONE ELSE...ITS TIME THAT THE PAY RANGE WAS PUT IN STEP WITH THE TIMES...AS THE DAYS OF BIG EXTRAVIGINT PAYING JOBS NEEDS TO COME TO AN END...FAR TO MANY OF THESE PEOPLE ARE OVER PAYED AND THIS IS A TREND THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDERSED SOON ..... IF THINGS KEEP GOING THE WAY THEY ARE THIS COUNTRY WILL BE IN THE SAME POSITION AS GREASE...WE ARE ALREADY AT A POINT THAT THE EVERYDAY JOE CAN JUST GET BYE AND LIVE WHILE SOME OTHERS ARE LIVING LIKE KINGS..MAKES ME SICK TO THINK ABOUT WHERE ALL THE TAX MONEY I PAY GOES..... JUST SAYING...

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    willimine bruendel
    - January 14, 2012 at 20:17:19

    Do the current drivers lose their jobs??I think when things run smooth it should be left alone,I can see problems down the road and a rise in fares ,which people useing the buses can not afford-that is why they use the bus.We did join the TCTS at one point for health reason and appts-but never was able to get service at any times need so $50 fee went down the drain--Hopefully things have changed??Time will tell- but I think you are makeing a big mistake -Kings Transit has done a great job even in bad weather .

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Spectator is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

More

  • No available services
Ad Finder

February 23rd 2012

View our Newspaper ads

Advertising